(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images) Scott Eisen/Getty Images The defense is scheduled to start presenting its case on Monday in Trump's fraud case. “Rather, where, as here, the President’s actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution.”īut Chutkan rejected that argument, writing that “to the contrary, America’s founding generation envisioned a Chief Executive wholly different from the unaccountable, almost omnipotent rulers of other nations at that time.”ĬLAREMONT, NEW HAMPSHIRE - NOVEMBER 11: Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a campaign event on Novemin Claremont, New Hampshire. “But as the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President’s motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide,” Trump’s attorneys wrote. Trump’s lawyers had asked Chutkan to throw out the four charges he faced in Washington because they said Trump was working to “ensure election integrity” as part of his official capacity as president when he allegedly undermined the 2020 election results, and therefore is protected under presidential immunity. She added that Trump’s “four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens.” Defendant may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office,” Chutkan wrote. Former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability. “Whatever immunities a sitting President may enjoy, the United States has only one Chief Executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass. It also means that unless an appeals court steps in, the judge sees no issue with Trump being tried in the coming year. Trump doesn’t have presidential immunity from lawsuits over January 6, appeals court rulesĬhutkan’s opinion – that came after an appeals court said earlier Friday that Trump could be sued in civil proceedings related to the January 6, 2021, riot – is a resounding blow on a significant question about presidential protections that Trump hoped to use as he tries to stave off criminal cases. ![]() (Photo by Jim Vondruska/Getty Images) Jim Vondruska/Getty Images The former president spoke on various topics pertaining to things that happened during his term in office as well as current events. She said that the bottom line is the bark was worse than the bite: “The headline looks scary, but we don’t see any immediate impact from these executive orders.”įor those who are worried about your gasoline prices going up, this is definitely not the reason.FORT DODGE, IOWA - NOVEMBER 18: Former President Donald Trump speaks to a crowd of supporters at the Fort Dodge Senior High School on Novemin Fort Dodge, Iowa. Hence, Biden feels compelled to pursue more aggressive actions. I remarked that President Biden seemed to be going further left than President Obama on these issues, and she said that is probably because climate change is widely viewed as a more pressing problem now. In that case we could end up using oil that is produced with more associated carbon emissions than if it had been produced in the U.S. In the long run, she said that a ban on drilling on federal land could lead to more imports. She added that some states that could be most impacted longer term are New Mexico, Wyoming, North Dakota, and Colorado. They expect to be able to execute on their federal lands program based on comments made in November.” For example, Devon Energy DVN has over four years of permit backlog and drilling inventory. Right now there are 7,700 unused permits. When I asked how companies might be affected, she explained “Companies have been stockpiling permits in anticipation of a move like this. They aren't looking at a full out fracking ban.” ![]() The executive order is a pause on new leases. The language on the Biden website discussed banning permitting on federal land. ![]() They were even a little bit softened from what was said during the campaign. “These executive orders were pretty well-telegraphed. She explained that the orders were certainly not as bad as they seemed: A complete ban would have to be passed by Congress, and that looks like a longshot.įor a more in-depth interpretation of Biden’s recent executive orders, I spoke with Stacey Morris, who is Director of Research for midstream index and data provider Alerian. The order does potentially impact some future fracking operations, but Biden did reiterate before he signed it "Let me be clear, and I know this always comes up, we're not going to ban fracking."īut what Biden can’t do by executive order is an overall ban on fracking, because most fracking takes place on private land.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |